Sleeping
beautifully
Australian
Julia Leigh's debut feature Sleeping Beauty (2011) is the
furthest possible take one can imagine on the classic 1697 French
fairy tale "La
Belle au bois dormant"
by Charles Perrault, and on the magnificent 1959 animated version of
said tale by Walt Disney (easily one of the handful of features the
studio made whose visual grandeur--it was shot in Super Technirama
70, took eight years to produce, six years to animate in a distinctly
elongated Gothic style--mostly overwhelms the standard Disney house
tone of namby-pamby wholesomeness). This film is closer (closer, not necessarily close) in spirit and
tone to Catherine Breillat's 2010 digital film, with the most
significant difference being a kinky twist to the story inspired by a
1961 Japanese novella by Yasunari Kawabata.
It
starts (unlike the two other versions) in modern day, introducing
Lucy (Emily Browning), a university student struggling to keep above
water financially--she works in a sterile office doing photocopying,
waitresses part-time in a cafe, and on occasion volunteers sex in a
high class bar (whether she goes through with it or not isn't clear).
Eventually she answers a newspaper ad, and finds herself being
interviewed by Clara (Rachael Blake). The job offered is decidedly
decadent: she is to attend a formal-wear dinner serving wine in
snow-white lingerie (that complements her equally pale skin), with
lipstick that matches exactly (and this Clara explicitly specifies) the color of her labia.
The
pay apparently is very good; Lucy returns seeking more work, and over
tea Clara informs her that if she consents (and here's where the
Kawabata story comes in), she will be given a powerful narcotic which
will put her to sleep, be laid in a large bed where a client will be
allowed to do everything and anything to her except penetrate her
vaginally.
The
sessions are the heart of the film, with Lucy's body often shot
head-on, the feet towards the camera, the image striking in its
symmetry yet with a tone of unsettling serenity. The clients respond
in a variety of ways--one licks her face, another drags her off the
bed. There's more, but easily the most disturbing reaction comes from
one client who sits at the foot of the bed opposite Clara and tells
her (while Lucy sleeps on) a long, rambling story that concludes with him despairingly saying he is
all “broken bones.” It's a moment of emotional nakedness, and
one can't help but think it's Leigh's way of making the character
more sympathetic, which one initially resists--why would anyone want
to feel sympathy towards this wealthy pervert?
One
is compelled to do so. Stripped, the men reveal
themselves to be a sad contrast to Lucy's gracefully perfect form.
Oh, some of them show signs of good maintenance--some muscle
definition here, there--but on the whole you can see where the sand
has slipped, you see the pathos of their tiny phalluses, hanging
limply over their shriveled scrotum sacs.
There's
more. Lucy on occasion shows up in what looks like a
research lab where a scientist takes a tube with a balloon attached
and slides it down her throat (the researcher is possibly conducting
a procedure called esophageal manometry, where the balloon measures
the strength of the esophagus' contracting muscles); at one point
Lucy sarcastically calls him “Dr. Frankenstein”--but why submit
to these tests? They're apparently paid for--Lucy signs what looks
like a waiver, and collects a yellow envelope that possibly contains
money--but all that discomfort repeated (she does this several times)
seems to indicate more than just a need for money. A masochistic
enjoyment of choking? An unanswered desire for penance? A flirtation
with the researcher (judging from their interaction, unlikely).
Perhaps a combination of all three?
Even
more puzzling is her relationship with a man called Birdmann (Ewen
Leslie), a lethargic, despairing man who seems attracted to Lucy and
grateful for her impromptu visits; conversely Lucy seems happier and
more relaxed with him than with anyone else in the film--she casually
agrees to his request to get married (nothing seems to come out of
this) and, deadpan, serves him a bowl of cereal with vodka poured on
top.
Later
we meet a man who seems to know both Birdmann and Lucy from way
back--an old friend, kind of. I say 'kind of' because when Lucy
throws him the question Birdmann used to throw at her--“will you
marry me?”--the man starts verbally abusing her.
Who
is he to her? Who is Birdmann to her? Why does Lucy go to that lab?
Leigh hangs these enigmatic (sometimes comically so) details like so
many Christmas ornaments on the central fablelike mystery of Lucy
lying asleep--what drives her to do this? She gets paid well--but for
a whole night? And doing God knows what? Why do the men do what they
do? That first client gives us an oblique clue (as a hedge against entropy and despair), but Leigh seems to hint at
more--there's something primal, something powerful in the image of
these wrinkled old creatures hovering like vampires over this helpless
girl. Possibly Leigh wants to evoke a sense of mortality as opposed to renewal, of flesh
corrupted by time lying side-by-side with the miracle of this
timeless, ethereal beauty and her breathtakingly smooth skin.
One
isn't quite sure what Leigh is getting at--whether she's attempting
to say something specific, or simply creating a mood, a feeling. She
seems to be a talented imagemaker who knows how to borrow
eclectically--the decadence of the dinner scene is possibly inspired
by Pier Paolo Pasolini's magisterially malevolent Salo (1975);
the old men in bed with her seem to recall the erotic, deadpan comical surrealism of
Luis Bunuel (I'm thinking Belle de Jour (1967)); the overall
fairytale ambiance, however, seems all her own. Fascinating debut
film--can she manage to say something more definite on her next
venture, or will she continue with this more oblique approach,
somehow retain our interest? One wonders.
First published in Businessworld, 5.10.12
2 comments:
Noel,
Thanks for the review: Belle de Jour as a reference did not occur to me, but I wondered if Leigh studied Godard's 60's movies on prostitution, especially, 2 or 3 Things I Know About Her: specifically, the sense of the private space of the heroine being transformed into a commercial space. Also, if I remember correctly, the periodic and seemingly non-sequitur dolly shots of Emily Browning walking along various streets appears to perform the same function as Godard's extensive shots of various roads and buildings in 2 or 3 things.
Godard didn't occur to me; Bunuel was the connection I made. Interesting, though.
Post a Comment