It's a miracle
Let's get the million-peso question out of the way: from my limited perspective Isang Himala does not measure up to Ishmael Bernal's 1982 classic film, not quite, but does easily stand out as the best of the four films I saw at the 2024 Metro Manila Film Festival.
"But how can this be?!" you ask. Well let me tell you.
(WARNING: story and plot twists discussed in explicit detail!)
Starting with the negatives: the biggest issue I have with Pepe Diokno's otherwise well-made film is the decision to make it a musical in the first place.* Himala was in part the result of Bernal's struggles with the original material: the script reportedly didn't reflect Bernal's own beliefs among other issues, and the film was apparently the result of his attempts to fill in gaps, by playing into the issues instead of resolving them.
*(As a rule not a fan of films turned into musicals turned into musical films-- have seen a few (Hairspray, The Producers, Disney's Beauty and the Beast, Little Shop of Horrors) and they're often overlong unwieldy creatures and unashamed cash grabs (well maybe not Isang Himala, and I did enjoy Frank Oz's Little Shop))
Hence the vagueness. Who raped Elsa and her friend? Who fired the gun? Who is Elsa in the first place, what kind of person is she-- a simpleton, a charlatan, the genuine article? Such questions bothered me at first; through the years they have kept me thinking about them and thinking about them and thinking about them till I came to the belated conclusion that the film isn't about religious skepticism, not completely, but about the compelling nature of all riddles, enigmas, mysteries-- said unresolved quality being both a demonstration of its theme and part of its enduring appeal. Bernal in effect couldn't quite appreciate the script and wrapped it in so much atmosphere and visual style that the final product-- as with an oyster wrapping a persistent irritant with layer upon layer of iridescent nacre-- is a fully formed pearl.
That's the 1982 production, an anti-religious film that perversely casts the seductive spell of religion (the ability to resolve an irreconcilable paradox through the power of faith) over its own audience; problem with setting such a story to song is that a character faced with a riddle or enigma or mystery in a musical mostly responds the same way: through song. Explaining said riddle, expositioning said enigma, recording to music in minute detail every emotion experienced along the way.
In the original Bernal and his production team worked hard not just to film a unique landscape (the barren sand dunes of Paoay, Ilocos Norte), where the lightest rain shower can be considered a miracle (ironically just before production arrived it had rained and the dunes were verdant with grass), but enable cinematographer Sergio Lobo doing arguably the best work in his career to keep the human figures distant and lost in a surreal landscape (if you're at all familiar with the Philippines and its rain forests you'd instinctively know why Paoay feels so surreal).
Diokno's film goes the opposite direction, plunking the fictional community of Cupang-- meant to represent any Filipino town-- on a recognizably stagy set, the camera smoothly gliding through stylized rickety shacks and pressing close against various faces, the better to catch their every expression. It's a style, markedly different from Bernal's, and I love the sinuous quality of the camera's tracking motion, but again the feel is more Broadway (or a Filipino level-best effort to emulate the same) than spiritual desert, and I'm missing the latter quality.
(And going out on a limb here but do I detect post-production digital meant to replicate cloud and sky and weather effects? If so I wish Diokno had doubled down on his decision to do a stage production (shades of Norman Jewison's Jesus Christ Superstar) and confined himself to a scrim with modulated lighting (if I'm wrong I apologize and withdraw the objection)).
The cast, mostly from stage, is amazing of course, and if I had to pick standouts I'd mention Kakki Teodoro's Nimia singing lyrics that rework Ricky Lee's words (especially in the nightclub scenes) into fuller religious satire; David Ezra as filmmaker/photojournalist Orly, formerly a stand-in for Bernal, now more explicitly a stand-in for us casual observers, and Neomi Gonzales as the tragic Chayong, Elsa's best friend turned fiercest believer turned eloquent if unspeaking critic.
As for Aicelle Santos as Elsa-- loved her singing voice and the fact that she's not a conventional beauty; as a more fully formed Elsa she's a heartrending actress. But I do miss Nora Aunor's iconic performance; she was distant, she was-- she seemed-- untouchable, with everyone swirling around trying to make sense of her or worship her. Her spiritual crisis is here given an entire musical number to help us understand and empathize with and I'm not ashamed to admit I did shed a tear empathizing, but what made Aunor's non-performance so memorable was that she didn't have to act, she simply had to be. Her dusky native beauty, unique in a cinema full of lightskinned mestizas, guarantees our eyes would remain locked on hers as she stood-- or knelt-- onscreen and spread her arms wide and gazed heavenwards at whatever it was she saw in the sky; the fact that we don't know why she does this or what exactly she sees is what makes the image so powerful.
Diokno's no Bernal as I suspect he'd be the first to agree; that said he has moves. The scene depicting Elsa's crisis begins with camera on shattered mirror, suggesting an entire scene having taken place just before the moment proper began. The film's climax has Elsa's believers in chaotic disarray, repeating Elsa's final words ("There is no miracle, the miracle is within us!") to the point that the words begin to feel like an unmistakably rhythmic chant, the new agnosticism replacing the former fanaticism as easily as swapping out a blown-out fuse-- here Diokno does approximate Bernal's meta-mythmaking, his imagery beginning to approach the level of Bernal's.
Seeing only four of ten festival films hardly qualifies me as an expert, but Diokno's film stands so tall above the rest I can't help but suspect it is the best, not just one of the better Filipino films I've seen in recent years but one of the best on the subject of fanaticism-- a subject that sadly remains relevant what with the recent cult of Duterte and the reigning cult of Trump. Wonderful film, hands down the best musical of the year (looking at you Wicked), and I'd submit close to a great one if it wasn't for the existence of Bernal and Aunor's inimitable original.
7 comments:
The town is called Cupang, not Cupas
Corrected
Great read, Noel. Thank you. What were the other 2 movies you saw? I'm interested to read your review of Green Bones.
Based on what you wrote in your glowing review, I'm not sure, but it appears to me you may have missed the fact that "Isang Himala" is Diokno's film adaptation of Lee and Vincent de Jesus' musical theater adaptation ("Himala: Isang Musikal") of Bernal's film. The credits said as much. Most of the film's cast, including the main players, came from the 2018 revival of the musical.
That's a well-known fact. I just want to say what I want to say.
Posted.
And now that I've clarified what I said, I went into a mini rant about films adapted into musicals adapted back into films. Ah well.
Post a Comment