I remember seeing Peque Gallaga's Oro, Plata, Mata (Gold, Silver, Death) on the big screen back in 1982--an impressive picture, back when our idea of a Filipino film was Lino Brocka's social-realist melodrama Maynila sa Mga Kuko ng Liwanag (Manila in the Claws of Neon), or Ishmael Bernal's multinarrative tapestry Manila By Night. Gallaga's epic was something else entirely: a period piece set in World War 2 full of endless tracking shots, slow motion, and (outside of the independent films of Kidlat Tahimik, or the occasional surreal experiment by Bernal) visual poetry for the sake of visual poetry, never mind that it was rarely justified by the narrative.
The
movie followed the lives of two upper-class families in the island
province of Negros, the Ojedas and the Lorenzos. The Oro
of the title described the conditions of life at the start of the war
(extravagant parties, mansions full of servants, banquet
tables groaning heavily with food); Plata
describes the Ojedas' visit to the Lorenzo's countryside hacienda to escape the oncoming Japanese (fields
of grain, hordes of water buffalo, a rooftop observatory under the
vast constellated night sky); Mata
goes deep into the war and deep into the rain forest, where the
Lorenzos maintain an airy but relatively modest vacation lodge, and where both families take refuge for the remainder of the war
(chicken coops, hunting trips, regular swims in crystal-clear
streams). More successfully than any other Filipino filmmaker Gallaga
is able to evoke the luxury of the upper-class Negros lifestyle,
possibly because he came from that society (but is not, apparently, a card-carrying member), and paints a broad canvas full of nostalgia
and great affection, and not a little good-natured ribbing
(the Lorenzo scion Miguel (Joel Torre), when faced with the prospect of
free sex, responds with astronomical gibberish; his mother Inday (Fides Cuyugan-Asensio), when faced
with the prospect of Japanese occupation, prays desperately to her
menagerie of plaster saints).
It's
beautifully structured, with the trajectory of the families' fate
described in the title (gold, silver, death); the characters are
fascinatingly conceived, their leisurely ways meant to be seen as too
chivalrous and impractical to survive the ordeal of wartime. In a way
the script takes a page from David O. Selznick's
superproduction--this too is an age gone with the wind. Gallaga
matches Jose Javier Reyes' ambitious script with a style appropriate
to the material: a tracking camera that glides easily, casually from one room to
another, following one guest after another, eavesdropping on one
conversation after another. The shot evokes everything from Orson
Welles' great The
Magnificent Ambersons
to Bernardo Bertolucci's gigantic if flawed 1900
to Luchino Visconti's tremendous Il
Gattopardo (The
Leopard)--and in fact
at one point the guests start a conga line, evoking the wedding
sequence in the latter film.
If
Gallaga's picture doesn't quite touch the heights of Il
Gattopardo that's
perhaps because he hasn't developed the layers of metaphor and
symbolism found in Visconti's masterpiece. Visconti's Prince is the
last of his line, painfully conscious of the changing winds of
history and the crumbling of his own exalted class; Miguel in Oro,
Plata is barely
conscious of his own budding sexuality, much less the winds of
change. There's a poignancy to Miguel's own story, a kind of
bildungsroman,
but the problem is that Miguel's character dwindles instead of
expanding, growing more complex--when confronting sexuality he panics and turns timid
(he has to be coaxed into making love, not once but twice); faced
with opposition and violence he counters with even more violence, an
emotional excess that seems to come out of nowhere (does sexual
repression cause that much neurosis?). Miguel doesn't consider that
perhaps the opposition--embodied mainly by his mother's former
majordomo Melchor (the late Abbo dela Cruz)--may have another point of
view, may have their own justifications for doing what they do.
Coming
to perhaps the most troubling aspect of the film--Melchor is clearly
meant to represent the lower classes, and his assault on the Lorenzos
and Ojedas are meant to show us an old war irony: it's not always the
foreign invader that commits the worse abuses, but one's own
countrymen (a point Gallaga may have learned while giving a wonderful performance in an earlier Filipino war film, Mario O'Hara's Tatlong Taong Walang Diyos (Three Years Without God, 1976)). Except Melchor is not just a fellow countryman: he's also
a member of the lower classes, and expresses the resentment and anger
of the lower classes. At one point Melchor asks his son to join him,
an offer his son rejects (like Scarlett O'Hara's servants in Gone
With the Wind, the son
has the mentality of a good slave) to which Melchor replies bitterly:
“all right, be a prisoner, then.”
Melchor
comes practically out of nowhere to shake the roots of the Lorenzo's
and Ojeda's deeply rooted, long-established balete
tree with a force even the Japanese could not muster; the script's
failure is to capitalize on that tremor, to show us the darker side
of upper-class Negro society as it exploited peonistic servitude to
fund its high-maintenance lifestyle. Abbo dela Cruz is an excellent
actor handicapped by an underwritten role: there are no differing
sides to his villainy, no point or justice to his rebellion other
than as an excuse to depict wartime atrocities inflicted by fellow
countrymen on each other (actually the revenge of the poor inflicted
on the rich--which makes it, of course, a fantasy). This is every
upper-class Filipino's nightmare, and is presented unambiguously as
such.
If
the characters fail to grow and the narrative fails to develop
layers, the imagery does increase in beauty and complexity--Miguel,
who has finally (after an unconscionable delay) grown a pair finds
nothing will satisfy his newly found manhood save a full-blown
massacre, Wild Bunch
style; Gallaga with the help of production designer Don Escudero and
cinematographer Rody Lacap fashions a ruined-hospital nightmare of
dark hallways and twisted rubble on which to stage the final
shootout; the violence recalls Peckinpah (though without matching his
exuberant poetry) and Francis Coppola's Apocalypse
Now (the deep shadows,
the oranged light), albeit at a fraction of either filmmakers'
budget.
If
I've come down hard on the picture's flaws, I feel it's a needed
corrective to its burnished (and in my book somewhat inflated)
reputation, adding that there is, after all, a happy conclusion to
all this--Gallaga, I suspect, learned from the experience and
addressed his issues not just well but brilliantly in his true
masterpiece, Scorpio
Nights (1984).
Flimsy characters? Have them shut up and fuck. Simplistic narrative?
Do away with story entirely! Excessive violence and sexuality? Have
them fuck more,
then end the film with a multiple homicide!
And
it works--the premise (a student and a housewife conduct an affair
under the very nose of her security guard husband) and the tone of
thick sensuality (inspired by Nagisa Oshima's In
the Realm of the Senses,
though I believe Gallaga trumps Oshima here in terms of tension and
psychological realism)
are strong political metaphors for life under the fascistic Marcos
administration. The lack of story points to the lovers' need to erase
her oppressive husband, erase the outside world, erase the very
narrative of their lives with sex, constantly aware of the
consequences should the husband ever find out (they are literally
fucking in the face of death). Oh, Gallaga has learned, all
right--instead of turning away from his appetites he faces them
head-on, and the result is one of the greatest Filipino erotic films
ever made.
In
the meantime there's this: a masterpiece not of narrative or social
analysis perhaps, but of epic imagery, cinematography, and
production design. I have not viewed the restoration; having seen the
original in all its big-screen glory, I can't imagine the digital
version being superior, no matter how high the definition. But I'm
sure it'll look great.
5 comments:
I watched the first few minutes of "The Leopard" and immediately I noticed the similarities between this and Visconti's work. I don't know what to feel.
Personally I much prefer the Visconti.
I prefer it too.
Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video
to make your point. You obviously know what youre talking about, why throw away your intelligence on just posting videos to your weblog when you could be giving us something informative to read?
Okay I'll bite--what is he talking about? I saw the film print several times, not some video. And there are no videos posted on the page, so no point to make through video. Probably spam, but I couldn't resist.
Post a Comment