tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12690266.post8170063510944453710..comments2024-03-24T20:15:00.996-04:00Comments on Critic After Dark: Bug (William Friedkin, 2006)Noel Verahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05904212081036547668noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12690266.post-1362957073008747212007-06-01T21:50:00.000-04:002007-06-01T21:50:00.000-04:00That's a pretty Dickian (or at least Ballardian) a...That's a pretty Dickian (or at least Ballardian) answer.<BR/><BR/>And--why not? The war is, in one way or another, responsible for Evans' condition, after all. He's basically correct--it's the details that are disputable. <BR/><BR/>Not to mention Friedkin makes extra sure that you always have the sense of outside forces ready to burst in at any time.Noel Verahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05904212081036547668noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12690266.post-67337308225818546072007-06-01T19:46:00.000-04:002007-06-01T19:46:00.000-04:00Not only can you argue that the relationship in Bu...Not only can you argue that the relationship in <B>Bug</B> is successful, but you can also argue that maybe the lovers are correct about the way the world works. Friedkin and Letts don't exclude this possibility, and even leave a few unsolved mysteries that support the lovers' case.Dan Sallitthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13136066978329749513noreply@blogger.com